Wednesday, May 23, 2007

War on Terror: Romney v. Obama Part I

Former Governor Mitt Romney (R - Massachusetts) on fighting the war on terror.

First, we have to sharply increase our investment in national defense. I want to see at least 100,000 more troops in our military. I want to see us finally make the long overdue investment in equipment and armament, weapon systems, and strategic defense. That's going to require that we spend at least 4 percent of our GDP on defense.

"Let me show you, by the way, a little history here. Let's see if I can make this work. This shows the history as a percentage of GDP of the U.S. military. And you'll see that over time, we've made some pretty significant investments in protecting our country. In the Korean War, 11.7% of the nation's economic activity was associated with the protection of this land. During the Reagan years, it reached approximately 6% of our GDP. Today, it's down to 3.8% and I believe that we have to increase at least by 40-50 billion dollars a year our spending on military strength.


Senator Barack Obama (D - Illinois) on fighting the war on terror:
This administration's first Secretary of Defense proudly acknowledged that he had inherited the greatest fighting force in the nation's history. Six years later, he handed over a force that has been stretched to the breaking point, understaffed, and struggling to repair its equipment.

Two-thirds of the Army is now rated "not ready" for combat. 88% of the National Guard is not ready to deploy overseas, and many units cannot respond to a domestic emergency.

Our men and women in uniform are performing heroically around the world in some of the most difficult conditions imaginable. But the war in Afghanistan and the ill-advised invasion of Iraq have clearly demonstrated the consequences of underestimating the number of troops required to fight two wars and defend our homeland. That's why I strongly support the expansion of our ground forces by adding 65,000 soldiers to the Army and 27,000 Marines.

A little reality. According to the US Army website, there are currently about 600,000 soldiers on active duty. This breaks down to 487,000 regular army, 72K National Guard, and 41K Army Reserves. For the Marines, the number is between 180K and 187K on active duty.
Despite their different sounding rhetoric, these two presidential candidates arrive at the same solution. One might be tempted to inquire of these two candidates what these extra troops would do?

References: See http://www.truthandpolitics.org/military-relative-size.php and or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_of_the_United_States

No comments: